(1 Jul 2024)
RESTRICTION SUMMARY:
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Washington – 22 May 2024
1. Various establishing shots of the U.S. Supreme Court
++SOUNDBITE PARTIALLY COVERED++
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press:
"The Supreme Court has ruled that former presidents can be immune from prosecution for acts they took while in office. But in the case of former President Donald Trump, it is leaving to a lower court to decide whether he can be prosecuted on charges he conspired to overturn the 2020 election. The outcome makes it unlikely that a trial could be held before the November election and suggests a lengthy delay before any trial could proceed."
ASSOCIATED PRESS
ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Michigan – 27 February 2024
3. STILL: A vote sign and an American flag are shown outside a Michigan primary election location
ASSOCIATED PRESS
ARCHIVE: Washington – 9 January 2024
4. STILL Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media at a hotel with his attorneys John Lauro, left, and D. John Sauer, right
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Washington – 22 May 2024
++SOUNDBITE PARTIALLY COVERED++
5. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press:
"Trump’s lawyers had asked for the case to be dismissed altogether, arguing that former presidents are absolutely immune from prosecution for actions they took while in office."
POOL
ARCHIVE: Washington – 9 January 2024
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Donald Trump, former U.S. President:
"As a president, you have to have immunity. Very simple."
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Washington – 22 May 2024
++SOUNDBITE PARTIALLY COVERED++
7. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press:
Those arguments were rejected by the trial judge in this case as well as a unanimous panel of the federal appeals court in Washington."
ASSOCIATED PRESS
ARCHIVE: Washington – 30 November 2021
8. Wide of DC flag hanging outside the DC Federal Court of Appeals building
STORYLINE:
The U.S. Supreme Court justices have sent Donald Trump’s immunity case back to a lower court in Washington, dimming the prospect of a pre-election trial.
In a historic 6-3 ruling, the justices said for the first time Monday that former presidents can be shielded from prosecution for at least some of what they do in the Oval Office.
But rather than do it themselves, the justices ordered lower courts to figure out precisely how to apply the decision to Trump’s case.
The court decided earlier in the day on whether state laws limiting how social media platforms regulate content posted by their users violate the Constitution.
===========================================================
Clients are reminded to adhere to all listed restrictions and to check the terms of their licence agreements. For further assistance, please contact the AP Archive on: Tel +44(0)2074827482 Email: info@aparchive.com.
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AP_Archive
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/APArchives
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/APNews/
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/0a1c6eb565164469b19988a4c2cbb416
Author: AP Archive
Go to Source
News post in July 6, 2024, 3:04 pm.
Visit Our Sponsor’s:
News Post In – News
